Use the Tab and Up, Down arrow keys to select menu items.
In achieving a dominant position, sport has become institutionalised and its meaning, significance and moral and ethical influence has a profound and powerful affect on society. This course introduces students to philosophical, moral and ethical foundations of sport. It examines a range of philosophical views of sport and considers its powerful influence on the attitudes and values of the individual and contemporary society. Sporting scenarios are examined and ethical decision making applied to critique the role, functions, meaning, and moral bases of sport.
1. Demonstrate an understanding of the philosophical nature of sport; 2. Demonstrate an understanding of institutional and practice views of sport;3. Explain and critique the educative value of sport;4. Examine moral significance in sport;5. Demonstrate an understanding of ethical decision making and moral reasoning;6. Examine values and how they influence participant attitudes in sport;7. Critique character building and its meaning in sport;8. Demonstrate an understanding of the Olympic Movement and other sporting movements;9. Examine and critique the notion of fair play and the use of technological aids in sport;10.Apply ethical decision making processes in sporting scenarios.
SPCO105 or EDSP180
EDSP283
Sue McBain
Required Texts and ReadingsArnold, P. (1996). Olympism, sport and education. QUEST, vol48, no.1, pp. 93-101.Arnold, P.J. (1997). Sport, ethics and education. London, UK: Cassell.Kretchmar., R. S. (2005). Practical philosophy of sport and physical activity (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Malloy, D.C., Ross, S., & Zakus, D.H. (2000). Sport ethics: Concepts and cases in sport and recreation. Toronto, CN: Thompson.Recommended Reading Arnold, P.J. (1997). Sport, ethics and education, London, UK: Cassell.Boxill, J. (2003). Sports ethics: An anthology, Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Gatz, M., Messner, M.A., Ball-Rokeach, S.J. (2002). Paradoxes of youth and sport, New York, NY: State University of New York.Hoberman., J. (2005). Testosterone dreams : rejuvenation, aphrodisia, doping Berkeley: University of California Press. Kretchmar., R. S. (2005). Practical philosophy of sport and physical activity (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Loland, S., Skirstad, B., & Waddington., I. (2006). Pain and injury in sport : social and ethical analysis. New York, NY Routledge.Lumpkin, A., Stoll, S.K., & Beller, J.M. (1999). Sport ethics: Application for fair play, Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.McFee, G. (2004). Sport, rules and values: philosophical investigations into the nature of sport. New York: Routledge.McNamee, M.J. (2008). Sports, virtues and vices: Morality Plays. London: Routledge.McNamee, M.J., & Parry, S.J. (1998). Ethics & sport, London, UK: E and F. N Spon.Malloy, D.C., Ross, S., & Zakus, D.H. (2000) Sport ethics: Concepts and cases in sport and recreation, Toronto, CN: Thompson.Ministry of Education (2000) The curriculum in action: Attitudes and values: Olympic ideals in physical education, Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.McFee., G. (2004). Sport, rules, and values : philosophical investigations into the nature of sport. London ; New York: Routledge.Miah, A. (2004). Genetically modified athlete : biomedical ethics, gene doping and sport. New York: Routledge.Morgan, W.J., Meier, K.V., & Schneider, A.J. (Eds) (2001) Ethics in sport, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Morgan., W. J. (2007). Ethics and sport (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Nucci, L.P. & Narvaez, D.,(Eds.)(2008). Handbook of moral and character education.New York: Routledge.Parry, J. (2007). Sport and Spirituality. New York: Routledge.Simon, R. (2004). Fair play : the ethics of sport (2nd ed.). Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.Schneider, A.J. and Hong, F., (Eds.) (2007). Doping in Sport: global ethical issues. New York: Routledge.Schneider, R.C. (2009). Ethics of Sport and Athletics: theory, issues and application. Philadelphia:Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Tamnsjo, T. & Tamburrini, C. (2000) Values in sport: Elitism, nationalism, gender equality and the scientific manufacture of winners, London, UK: E & FN Spon.Walsh, A., & Giulianotti, R. (2007). Ethics, money, and sport : this sporting mammon. Abingdon Routledge.
Library portalUCStudentWeb: https://ucstudentweb.canterbury.ac.nz] Learn: http://learn.canterbury.ac.nz/] Library: http://www.library.canterbury.ac.nz/] Aegrotat http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/exams/aegrotats.shtml] Course Links: http://www.un.org/themes/sport/] http://www.peace-sport.org/]
All forms of cheating and dishonest practice are taken seriously and penalties will result. Students should refer to General Course and Examination Regulation J: Dishonest Practice and Breach of Instructions in the University of Canterbury Calendar and the Assessment Guidelines for Students: Assessment, Referencing and Written Assignment Preparation for Physical Education and BSpC, Courses, 2011 in the BSpC coursebook
Grading ScaleFinal results for this course will be reported using: A+, A, A-, B+, B, B-, C+, C, D and EAssessment against progressive standards of achievementIn this course students are assessed against defined standards that describe progressive levels of achievement. The final grade for the course is calculated by averaging the grades obtained for each assessment task and taking into account the weighting assigned to each piece of work. In order to obtain on overall passing grade students are required to obtain a C grade or above for ALL assessment tasks in the course. See the Assessment Guidelines for Students: Assessment, Referencing and Written Assignment Preparation for Physical Education and BSpC Courses, 2011 for further information on grades and criteria.In this course student performance is assessed in relation to defined standards that describe progressive levels of achievement. For these courses the following 10 point scale is used to report students’ achievement in course assignments and examinations. A+ = 85-100%A = 80-84%A- = 75-79% B+ = 70-74%B = 65-69%B- = 60-64%C+ = 55-59%C = 50-54%D = 35-49%E = 0-34%The criteria used to assess students’ work vary according to the type of assessment but usually include the quality of organisation, evidence of wide reading, the ability to select appropriate material, the clarity and relevance of argument and evidence, originality and style.For individual pieces of assessment, lecturers will generally use more specific criteria. However, the following broad definitions of grades on the scale may help students understand the standards used by lecturers.A/A+ = ExcellentWork is of outstanding quality in all respects.B+/A- = Very Good Work is of a very high quality in most respects. It may fail to be outstanding in several criteria.B = GoodWork is of a reasonably high quality, meeting all of the criteria to a satisfactory standard.B-/C+/C = Fair to reasonableWork at this level is acceptable and just meets most or all of the criteria. D/E grades = Very WeakWork which is clearly deficient in almost all respects. When the required work has not been done or is not submitted by the specific deadline.
Attendance is both expected and required as some assessments require attendance to complete the assessment task. Students with poor attendance will jeopardise their ability to pass this course.
Students will be asked to complete Course and Teacher Evaluations using UCTL evaluative instruments. The Faculty of Education will conduct regular graduate surveys under the direction of the Dean of Education.
All course assessments are moderated within courses and selected courses assessments are moderated externally. A sample of your work may be used as part of the internal and external moderation process. Regular Validation Meetings monitor the distribution of final grades in courses and adjustments are made if necessary to ensure reasonable consistency and comparability of course grades.
Work is late if it is handed in after the due date. If an assessment is submitted after the due date, without good reason, the lecturer may; choose not to mark the work and a fail grade will result or deduct marks consistent with the overdue period. No assessment task will be accepted after a period of 3 days after the due date unless an extension has been granted.
Additional course costs: nilOther Notes:Students should refer to the BSpC coursebook: Assessment Guidelines for Students: Assessment, Referencing and Written Assignment Preparation for Physical Education and BSpC for further information on course assessment. Also, further information can be found in the UC calendar. The UC calendar is available online at: http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/publications/calendar.shtml.
All assessment tasks are required to be submitted and must have a cover sheet (available on-line), word count and referenced according to APA convention. Information relating to APA referencing can be obtained from both the Central and Education Libraries. This is also available online at: http://library.canterbury.ac.nz/services/ref/apa/
Extensions will be granted at the discretion of the lecturer. Requests for extensions must be submitted in writing on the appropriate form at least 48 hours prior to the due date. In exceptional circumstances, where this is not appropriate, the student should discuss their situation with the course lecturer as soon as possible.
In order to pass this course students must have passed all assessment events with a C grade or better. Students will have the opportunity to resubmit one failed piece of assessment that originally received a mark between 40% - 49%. The resubmission will receive a maximum pass grade of 50%. Resubmissions will not apply to any examinations held during the University of Canterbury examination periods.
Students should refer to General Course and Examination Regulation H: Aegrotat Consideration and Aegrotat Consideration: Procedures in the UC Calendar. The UC calendar is available online at: http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/publications/calendar.shtml.
Lecturers may ask students to submit an electronic copy and a hardcopy for an assignment. Lecturers will advise if hardcopy assessment tasks are to be submitted to the course lecturer’s office mailbox or to the School of Sciences & PE administration office. If electronic copies are also required to be submitted, an electronic ‘dropbox’ on the course ‘Learn’ site will be made available. Once assessed, students will be advised if assignment work is to be collected from the course lecturer or the School of Sciences & PE administration office located on the ground floor of the Te Pourewa building.
Domestic fee $595.00
International fee $2,750.00
* All fees are inclusive of NZ GST or any equivalent overseas tax, and do not include any programme level discount or additional course-related expenses.
For further information see School of Sport and Physical Education .