SPCO208-11S1 (C) Semester One 2011

Critical and Bicultural Perspectives in Sport Coaching

15 points

Details:
Start Date: Monday, 21 February 2011
End Date: Sunday, 26 June 2011
Withdrawal Dates
Last Day to withdraw from this course:
  • Without financial penalty (full fee refund): Sunday, 6 March 2011
  • Without academic penalty (including no fee refund): Sunday, 22 May 2011

Description

Prospective coaches of sport in New Zealand need to understand bicultural and multicultural sporting perspectives and have a sound social theory knowledge base to develop critical thinking and reflection skills about sport and their own coaching practices. This course will explore the nature of the sport and sport coaching through social theory lenses and develop understandings of how this can be applied to students own coaching practice.

Learning Outcomes

  • By the end of this course successful students will be able to:
  • An introduction to social theory related to sport and sport coaching
  • The relationship between sport and gender
  • Sociological & bicultural perspectives on the relationship between sport, sport coaching and identity.
  • Theories related to violence and sport including examination of the role of the sport coach in the promotion of player violence.
  • The commodification of sport and its impact on sport, athletes and sport coaching.
  • Contemporary bi-cultural issues in New Zealand sport
  • Sociological factors impacting on Maori sport participation
  • The application of bicultural coaching principles to coaching practices, administrating and on athletes
  • The application of bi-cultural coaching principles and practices to multi-cultural sporting contexts for coaches, administrators and athletes

Prerequisites

SPCO105 or EDSP180

Restrictions

EDSP282, EDSP284

Course Coordinator / Lecturer

Hugh Galvan

Lecturer

Sue McBain

Assessment

Assessment Due Date Percentage 
Exam 60%
Test 19 Aug 2011 40%

Textbooks / Resources

Required Texts and Readings

Recommended Reading
1. Azzarito, L., & Harrison, L. (2008). White men can't jump: race, gender and natural athleticism. Internation review for the sociology of sport, 43(347).
2. Belgrave, M., Kawharu, M., & Williams, D. (2005). Waitangi revisited: perspectives on the Treaty of Waitangi. South Melbourne, Vic: Oxford University Press.
3. Cassidy, T. G., Jones, R. L., & Potrac, P. (2004). Understanding sports coaching: the social, cultural and pedagogical foundations of coaching practice Routledge (UK). .
4. Caudwell, J. (Ed.). (2006). Sport, sexualities and queer/theory. New York: Routledge.
5. Coakley, J. (2007). Sports in society: Issues & controversies (9th. ed.). Boston, Mass: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
6. Connell., R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
7. Culpan, I., Bruce, J. and Galvan, H. (2008) Towards a bicultural view of Olympism within New Zealand physical education: An emerging journey. In Centre d'Estudis Olimpics (Ed.), International Olympic Reader. (p129-146). Barcelona: Universitat Autonoma Barcelona.
8. Davis, P. & Weaving C. (Eds.). (2010). Philosophical perspectives on gender in sport and physical   activity. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
9. Dunning, E., & Malcolm, D. (Eds.). (2003). Sport London ; New York: Routledge
10. Gard, M., & Wright, J. (2005). The obesity epidemic: science, mortality and ideology. New York: Routledge.
11. Giulianotti, R. (Ed.). (2004). Sport and modern social theorists . . Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
12. Hargreaves, J., & Vertinsky, P. A. (Eds.). (2007). Physical culture, power, and the body. Abingdon, Oxon, England ; New York Routledge.
13. Hokowhitu., B. J. (2002). Te mana Māori : Te tātari i ngā kōrero parau. University of Otago Dunedin.
14. Hokowhitu, B. (2004). Tackling Mäori masculinity: a colonial genealogy of savagery and sport The Contemporary Pacific, 15(1).
15. Hokowhitu, B. (2003). Mäori physicality: stereotypes, sport and the “physical education” of New Zealand Mäori. Culture, Sport, Society, 6(2).
16. Hokowhitu, B. (2003). Mäori masculinity, post-structuralism, and the emerging self. New Zealand Sociology, 18(2).
17. Hokowhitu, B. (2003). Race tactics: the racialised athletic body. Junctures, 1.
18. Hokowhitu, B. (2003). Te täminga o te mätauranga Mäori: colonisation in education. . In T. Ka’ai, Moorfield, J. and Reilly (Ed.), Ki te Wheiao: An Introduction to Mäori Society. Auckland: Pearson Education New Zealand.
19. Houlihan, B. (2003). Sport and society. London, UK: Sage.
20. Jackson, S., & Hokowhitu, B. (2002). Sport, tribes and technology: the New Zealand All Blacks haka and the politics of identity. Journal of Sport and Social Issues,, 26(2), 125-139.
21. Jones, R., Hughs, M., & Kingston, K. (2007). From science and theory to practice: Routledge (UK).
22. Kirk, D., Nauright, J., MacDonald, D., & Jobling, I. (1996). The sociocultural foundations of human movement. Sydney, NSW: MacMillan.
23. Metge, J. (2004). A new Māori migration: rural and urban relations in northern New Zealand. Oxford:Berg.
24. Metge, J., & Kinlock, P. (1984). Talking past each other: people of cross cultural communication. Wellington, NZ: Victoria.
25. Laker, A. (2002). The sociology of sport and physical education. London, UK: Routledge.
26. Rangimarie-Pere, R. (1997). Te wheke: A celebration of infinite wisdom. Gisborne, NZ: Ao Ako Global Learning.
27. Metge, J., & Kinlock, P. (1984). Talking past each other: people of cross cultural communication. Wellington, NZ: Victoria.
28. Laker, A. (2002). The sociology of sport and physical education. London, UK: Routledge.
29. Rangimarie-Pere, R. (1997). Te wheke: A celebration of infinite wisdom. Gisborne, NZ: Ao Ako Global Learning.
30. Kirk, D. (2006). The "obesity crisis" and school physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 11(2), 121-133.
31. Mulholland, M. (Ed.). (2006). State of the Māori nation : twenty-first century issues in Aotearoa / Malcolm Mulholland and contributors Auckland, N.Z: Reed.
32. Spoonley, P., Macpherson, C., & Pearson., D. (Eds.). (2004). Tangata, tangata : the changing ethnic contours of New Zealand / edited by Southbank, Vic: Thomson.
33. Spoonley, P., Pearson, D., & Macpherson., C. (1996).  Nga Patai : racism and ethnic relations in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Palmerston North, N.Z: Dunmore Press.
34. Sugden, J., & Tomlinson, A.  (2002). Power games: A critical sociology of sport. London, UK: Routledge.
35. Tomlinson., A. (Ed.). (2007). The sport studies reader. London ; New York Routledge.
36. Wright, J. Macdonald, D., & Burrows, L. (2004).  Critical inquiry and problem solving in physical education. London, UK: Routledge.
37. Yiannakis, A., & Melnick, M. J. (2001). Contemporary issues in sociology of sport  Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Journals
Coaching and Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching

Additional Course Outline Information

Academic integrity

All forms of cheating and dishonest practice are taken seriously and penalties will result. Students should refer to General Course and Examination Regulation J: Dishonest Practice and Breach of Instructions in the University of Canterbury Calendar and the Assessment Guidelines for Students: Assessment, Referencing and Written Assignment Preparation for Physical Education and BSpC, Courses, 2011 in the BSpC coursebook.

Assessment and grading system

Assessment and grading system

Assessment against progressive standards of achievement
In this course students are assessed against defined standards that describe progressive levels of achievement.  The final grade for the course is calculated by averaging the grades obtained for each assessment task and taking into account the weighting assigned to each piece of work.  In order to obtain on overall passing grade students are required to obtain a C grade or above for ALL assessment tasks in the course. See the Assessment Guidelines for Students: Assessment, Referencing and Written Assignment Preparation for Physical Education and BSpC Courses 2011, in the BSpC Course book for further information on grades and criteria. The following 10 point scale is used to report students’ achievement in course assignments and examinations.

A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
D
E

≥85%
80-84%
75-79%
70-74%
65-69%
60-64%
55-59%
50-54%
35-49%
0-34%


The criteria used to assess students’ work vary according to the type of assessment but usually include the quality of organization, evidence of wide reading, the ability to select appropriate material, the clarity and relevance of argument and evidence, originality and style.
For individual pieces of assessment, lecturers will generally use more specific criteria.  However, the following broad definitions of grades on the scale may help students understand the standards used by lecturers.

A/A+ = Excellent:
Work is of outstanding quality in all respects.

B+/A- = Very Good
Work is of a very high quality in most respects. It may fail to be outstanding in several criteria.

B = Good
Work is of a reasonably high quality, meeting all of the criteria to a satisfactory standard.

B-/C+/C = Fair to reasonable
Work at this level is acceptable and just meets most or all of the criteria.  

D/E grades = Very Weak
Work which is clearly deficient in almost all respects
When the required work has not been done or is not submitted by the specific deadline.

Attendance

Attendance is both expected and required as some assessments require attendance to complete the assessment task. Students with poor attendance will jeopardise their ability to pass this course.

Evaluation

Students will be asked to complete Course and Teacher Evaluations using UCTL evaluative instruments. The Faculty of Education will conduct regular graduate surveys under the direction of the Dean of Education.

Grade moderation

All course assessments are moderated within courses and selected courses assessments are moderated externally. A sample of your work may be used as part of the internal and external moderation process. Regular Validation Meetings monitor the distribution of final grades in courses and adjustments are made if necessary to ensure reasonable consistency and comparability of course grades.

Late submission of work

Work is late if it is handed in after the due date. If an assessment is submitted after the due date, without good reason, the lecturer may choose not to mark the work and a fail grade will result or deduct marks consistent with the overdue period. No assessment task will be accepted after a period of 3 days after the due date unless an extension has been granted.

Notes

Students should refer to BSpC coursebook: Assessment Guidelines for Students: Assessment, Referencing and Written Assignment Preparation for Physical Education and BSpC for further information on course assessment. Also, further information can be found in the UC calendar. The UC calendar is available online at: http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/publications/calendar.shtml

Other specific requirements

All assessment tasks are required to be submitted and must have a cover sheet (available on-line), word count and referenced according to APA convention. Information relating to APA referencing can be obtained from both the Central and Education Libraries. This is also available online at: http://library.canterbury.ac.nz/services/ref/apa/

Requests for extensions

Extensions will be granted at the discretion of the lecturer. Requests for extensions must be submitted in writing on the appropriate form at least 48 hours prior to the due date. In exceptional circumstances, where this is not appropriate, the student should discuss their situation with the course lecturer as soon as possible.

Resubmissions

In order to pass this course students must have passed all assessment events with a C grade or better. Students will have the oppootunity to resubmit one failed piece of assessment that originally required a mark between 40%-49%. The resubmission will receive a maximum pass grade of 50%. Resubmissions will not apply to any examinations held during the University of Canterbury examination periods.

Aegrotat Considerations

Students should refer to General Course and Examination Regulation H: Aegrotat Consideration and Aegrotat Consideration: Procedures in the UC Policy Library
Aegrotat grades are not available for assessments in this course.
http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/exams/aegrotats.shtml, please see Course links.

Where to submit and collect work

Lecturers may ask students to submit an electronic copy and a hard copy for an assignment. Lecturers will advise if hardcopy assessment tasks are to be submitted to the course lecturer's office mailbox or to the School of Sciences & PE administration office. If electronic copies are also required to be submitted, an electronic 'dropbox' on the course 'Learn' site will be made available. Once assessed, students will be advised if assignment work is to be collected from the course lecturer or the School of Sciences & PE administration office located on the ground floor of the Te Pourewa building.

Indicative Fees

Domestic fee $595.00

International fee $2,750.00

* All fees are inclusive of NZ GST or any equivalent overseas tax, and do not include any programme level discount or additional course-related expenses.

For further information see School of Sport and Physical Education .

All SPCO208 Occurrences

  • SPCO208-11S1 (C) Semester One 2011